USPTO serial 99169329
ASHOKA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 748
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COUGHLAN, REBECCA D.
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ASHOKA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
H. Dale Langley
H. Dale Langley The Langley Law Firm, P.C.1803 West AvenueAustin, TX 78701United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Pickles; canned fruits and vegetables; Frozen fruits and vegetables; prepared, packaged, ready to eat and frozen Indian vegetable and curry dishes, namely, beans in spiced tomato sauce, spinach and paneer cheese in curried sauce, mashed vegetables in spiced butter and chili sauce, curried chick peas in spiced hot sauce, curried green peas and lentils in spiced tomato sauce; pastes, namely, vegetable pastes, pressed fruit pastes and meat pastes | ACTIVE | Oct 31, 1983 |
| 030 | Chutney; chutneys, condiment paste, namely, masala, curry and biryani seasoning pastes, spices, frozen flat Indian breads, namely, Naan, Kulcha, Paratha, Chapati; sauces, dipping sauces; cooked and semi cooked rice; fruit paste for flavoring of food; canned and frozen Indian sweets in the nature of frozen confectionery | ACTIVE | Oct 31, 1983 |
| 031 | Fresh lentils | ACTIVE | Jun 30, 2025 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2026 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 9, 2026 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2026 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 17, 2026 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 20, 2026 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2026 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 14, 2026 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2025 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 22, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 23, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |