Drawing for BOWSER

USPTO serial 99169668

BOWSER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MEYERS, MORGAN LAURA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BOWSER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Matthew D. Delaney

Matthew D. Delaney Frost Brown Todd LLP3300 Great American Twr., 301 E. 4th St.Cincinnati, OH 45202United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware and recorded software for operating signal processing apparatus sold as a unit; signal detecting and analyzing apparatus; digital signal detector; analog signal detector; signal processing apparatus, namely, software-defined radio (SDR) for detecting, analyzing, and geo-locating radio frequency signals; spectrum analyzers for use in wideband radio frequency monitoring, commercial protocol decoding, and signal change detection; electronic detectors for observing and measuring the radio frequency spectrum, namely, radio frequency detectors; computer hardware, namely, single-board computers with memory and processing capabilities for running signal detecting and analyzing software; self-contained electronic signal monitoring and processing system comprising a signal receiver, signal processing software, and graphical user interfaceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 20, 2026MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 20, 2026ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 16, 2025NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 21, 2025NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 21, 2025PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 15, 2025NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 24, 2025CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 22, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 5, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 5, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 5, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance