USPTO serial 99172099
LORIEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 762
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DIBBLE,JENNA M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LORIEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LAKE WORTH, FL, US
Lake Worth, FL, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CARISSA L. BOUWER
CARISSA L. BOUWER DLA PIPER LLP (US)3203 HANOVER STREET, SUITE 100PALO ALTO, CA 94304UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) featuring software using artificial intelligence for database management; Artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) featuring software using artificial intelligence for analyzing data and interacting with humans; Artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for loan processing in the field of mortgages and banking; none of the foregoing provided in the field of employment recruiting, employee development, business training, or educational services | ACTIVE | May 6, 2025 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2026 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 14, 2026 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Aug 19, 2026 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 26, 2026 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2026 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2026 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 22, 2026 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 22, 2026 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 22, 2026 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 20, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2026 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 11, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2026 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2026 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2026 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2026 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 24, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 6, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 15, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |