Drawing for OEM ORIGINAL EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURER

USPTO serial 99173232

OEM ORIGINAL EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 653
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
AGREDA, SAMANTHA LEIGH
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 123

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OEM ORIGINAL EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jonathan M. Gelchinsky

Jonathan M. Gelchinsky Pierce Atwood LLP254 Commercial StreetPortland, ME 04101United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Antifreeze; Coolants for vehicle engines; Brake fluids; Power steering fluid; Chemical additives for stabilizing fuel; Transmission oil; Anti-freeze chemicals; Chemical additives for coolantsACTIVE
003Windshield washing fluidACTIVE
004Motor oilACTIVE
007Oil filters; Air filters for automobile engines; Spark plugsACTIVE
012Windshield wiper bladesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 13, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Feb 13, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Feb 13, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Feb 13, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jan 15, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 15, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 15, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 24, 2025XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED
Dec 24, 2025XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED
Sep 29, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 16, 2025MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED
Sep 16, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
May 7, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
May 7, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance