Drawing for BREEZY

USPTO serial 99174196

BREEZY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BEAUDRY-TORRES, FAITH
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 126

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BREEZY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Douglas M. Lee

3916 N. Potsdam Avenue #4595STE 10295Sioux Falls, SD 57104

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for solo service professionals and small and medium sized enterprises for answering phone calls, scheduling appointments, customer relationship management, and business communications automation; Design and development of artificial intelligence (AI) software for business operations automation through an artificial intelligence (AI) front desk and an artificial intelligence (AI) back officeACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 7, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 2, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 5, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 5, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 5, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 4, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 4, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 4, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 7, 2026XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Jan 7, 2026XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 15, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 15, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 16, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 7, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 7, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance