USPTO serial 99175589
KINETIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEY,THOMAS S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 130
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KINETIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Westlake Village, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Seth H. Reagan
Seth H. Reagan Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP2050 Main St., Suite 1100Irvine, CA 92604United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Platform as a Service (PAAS) and Software as a Service (SAAS) services featuring computer software for enabling customization and control in the creation, deployment, and optimization of web-based game hubs, entertainment platforms, and interactive digital environments; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software and applications for building, managing, and enhancing immersive web experiences through a modular and extensible architecture; software development consulting in the field of video games, computer games, and websites; design and development of computer software for video games, computer games, and websites; providing online non-downloadable computer software platforms optimized for game-centric interfaces, featuring adaptive layout engines for responsive rendering across devices and resolutions, supporting real-time content manipulation and dynamic logic embedding; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software development tools for developing, launching, and scaling video games, computer games, and websites; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for creating, managing, tracking, and measuring online marketing and advertising campaigns designed to assist gaming publishers; providing online non-downloadable computer software platforms incorporating semantic configuration languages compatible with artificial intelligence for automated generation, deployment, maintenance, and optimization of digital experiences; enabling detailed personalization of page elements, live data integration, variable management, and real-time customization at scale; providing software platforms for designing the infrastructure and appearance of websites to enhance player engagement and increase game title and brand loyalty | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 29, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 8, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 24, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |