USPTO serial 99176739
WAR2IN WARRIOR TO INSPECTOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HSU, FONG
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 129
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Deadline: October 21, 2026
Need help with WAR2IN WARRIOR TO INSPECTOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Office Action issues
The USPTO examiner identified the need for an additional fee due to fill-in-the-blank wording, correct individual signature details, service description clarification, and proper fee coverage for multiple classes.
Owner
FLAGSTAFF, AZ, US
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business Management and Consulting Services · Business consulting services in the field of quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) for industrial and construction sectors · Advisory services relating to compliance with industry standards and regulatory requirements in non-destructive testing (NDT) · Business management consultancy for inspection and testing service providers · Assistance in business operations of companies engaged in steel structure manufacturing and inspection · Compilation and analysis of business data related to inspection outcomes and quality metrics · Outsourced administrative support and business process management for inspection and certification | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 10, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2026 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 14, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 25, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |