USPTO serial 99180322
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Las Vegas, NV, US
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Erik C. Alberts
Erik C. Alberts Hollywood Trademarks2901 Ocean Park Blvd.Ste 201Santa Monica, CA 90405| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Tops as clothing; Bottoms as clothing; Swimwear; Hats; Sports bras; Windbreakers; Jump suits; Dresses | ACTIVE | Aug 19, 2023 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 5, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 5, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 2, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 2, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 1, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |