USPTO serial 99182167
ECOACACIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUSKIN,MATTHEW SEAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ECOACACIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Wimberley, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tyler Beas
Tyler Beas Vela Wood P.C.5307 East Mockingbird LaneSuite 800Dallas, TX 75206Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Bowls made of wood; Cutting boards; Wooden cooking spoons; Serving spoons; Cooking forks; Serving forks; Household utensils, namely, spatulas; Household utensils, namely, turners; Kitchen ladles; Serving ladles; Serving trays; Serving boards for food; Cheese boards; Charcuterie boards for serving and cutting charcuterie; Carving boards; Chopping boards for kitchen use; Plates; Serving plates; Cake stands; Stands for dishes; Trays for domestic purposes, not of metal; Serving trays not of precious metal; Bread boards; Pizza peels; Pizza tray stands; Serving platters; Laundry baskets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 20, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 3, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |