Drawing for BOTBOSS

USPTO serial 99182826

BOTBOSS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 653
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COUEY,JORDAN ELIZABETH
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 130

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BOTBOSS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kevin M. Repper

Kevin M. Repper Kilyk & Bowersox, P.L.L.C.3925 Chain Bridge RoadSuite D-401Fairfax, VA 22030

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009downloadable operating system software for robots; warehouse execution systems comprised of supervisor servers, namely, computer servers and downloadable software for managing, monitoring, and controlling distributed systems; downloadable software for managing industrial processes, logistics, and warehouse execution systems in the nature of modules for load management, route management, facility management, and analytics; industrial personal computers, namely, control-area industrial personal computers and vehicle-mounted industrial personal computers, for use in industrial automation and logistics; downloadable software for task management in the field of material handling systems and industrial automated systems; downloadable software featuring communication protocols for integrating server, control-area, and vehicle systemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 31, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 3, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 3, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 3, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 5, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 5, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 5, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 14, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 14, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 14, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 22, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 13, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 13, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance