USPTO serial 99182918
PETWYZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MILMOE, MAUREEN H
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PETWYZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sheridan, WY, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jordan K. Snyder
Jordan K. Snyder Hartsell Ozery, P.A.61 NE First St, Ste CPompano Beach, FL 33060United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application using artificial intelligence (AI) for analyzing data-driven information about specific pets, which serves both owners and veterinarians, based on breed and medical records to provide insight into medical trends of pets and to provide suggestions on supplies, services, and products in the local area that would be personalized and specific to each individual pet | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing an on-line, non-downloadable, Internet-based software application using artificial intelligence (AI) for analyzing data-driven information about specific pets, which serves both owners and veterinarians, based on breed and medical records to provide insight into medical trends of pets and to provide suggestions on supplies, services, and products in the local area that would be personalized and specific to each individual pet | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 30, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 13, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2026 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 29, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 5, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 3, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |