USPTO serial 99186958
SIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NANNEY, KATHERINE N
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 132
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew G. Minder
Matthew G. Minder Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP211 N BroadwaySuite 3600St. Louis, MO 63102Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software platforms for enabling users to electronically mine, exchange, store, send, receive, accept and transmit digital tokens based on blockchain technology; Downloadable software for use in accessing, reading, tracking, and using blockchain technology; Downloadable computer software for facilitating cryptocurrency transactions by creating and encrypting digital tokens based on blockchain technology; Recorded computer software for facilitating cryptocurrency transactions by creating and encrypting digital tokens based on blockchain technology; Downloadable software for use in cloud storage of data | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Charitable foundation services, namely, providing financial support to software developers for research and development in the field of decentralized cloud storage of data | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Research and development of technology in the field of cloud storage of data; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable web-based decentralized applications (DApps) for cloud storage of data; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software development tools for cloud storage of data; Design and development of computer software for cloud storage of data; Providing on-line non-downloadable software for facilitating a cryptocurrency transactions by creating and encrypting digital tokens based on blockchain technology; Providing on-line non-downloadable software for enabling users to electronically mine, exchange, store, send, receive, accept and transmit digital tokens based on blockchain technology; Design and development of computer software for peer-to-peer networks using blockchain technology; Developing and updating computer software; Application service provider featuring application programming interface (API) software for providing a platform for the development, testing, and integration of blockchain software applications; Computer services, namely, acting as an application service provider in the field of information management to host computer application software for the purpose of developing, testing, and integrating blockchain applications and software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 9, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 9, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 3, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 10, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 2025 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |