USPTO serial 99191234
WAVIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MILLER,AMANDA A
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WAVIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Scottsdale, AZ, US
Scottsdale, AZ, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES BISHOTA
CHARLES BISHOTA BISHOTA LAW PLLC5760 LEGACY DRIVE SUITE B3-336PLANO, TX 75024UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Providing electronic processing of electronic funds transfer, ACH, credit card, debit card, electronic check and electronic payments in the nature of secured payment gateway services for vendors to process payments of third parties and for point-of-sale credit card, debit card, gift card, ACH and electronic payments; Providing electronic processing of electronic funds transfer, ACH, credit card, debit card, electronic check and electronic payments in the nature of payment gateway services, namely, authorizing and processing secure, real-time payments for others over a network connection; electronic bill payment involving electronic processing and subsequent transmission of bill payment data; providing financial information by electronic means; providing electronic processing of electronic funds transfer, ACH, credit card, debit card, electronic check and electronic payments via a global computer network; providing financial services, namely, facilitating financial transactions in the field of payment services in the nature of electronic funds transfers and credit, debit and prepaid card transaction processing; check processing; credit card authorization services; credit card payment processing services; credit card transaction processing services via the Internet; credit card verification; electronic credit card and debit card transaction payment processing services for use by online retailers; financial transaction services, namely, providing secure commercial transactions and payment options using a mobile device at a point of sale; gift card transaction processing services; merchant services, namely, payment transaction processing services; online banking and related financial services, namely, bill payment and electronic processing of electronic debit card, credit card, and electronic wallet payments featuring a payment collection gateway and remote online payment services that link to streamline and connect card and ACH bill pay receivables; providing electronic processing of electronic funds transfer, ACH, credit card, debit card, electronic check, electronic payments; Merchant services, namely, payment transaction processing service for merchants and business management software providers utilizing point-to-point encryption and tokenization to increase payment data security | ABANDONED | May 12, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2026 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 23, 2026 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 23, 2026 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 23, 2026 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 3, 2026 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 2, 2026 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 3, 2026 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2026 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2026 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 28, 2026 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 8, 2026 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2026 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2026 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2026 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 15, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 1, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2025 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Aug 25, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 25, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |