USPTO serial 99193202
EET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARTNER, JOHN M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brent D. Sausser
Brent D. Sausser Sausser Summers, PC1022 Travers Dr.Charleston, SC 29412United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Download able computer software applications for philosophy-based computation, ethical analysis, machine behavior modeling, and for use in decision evaluation systems, namely, tools for ethical scoring, philosophical simulation for modeling ethical behavior, creating and developing self-regulating ethical simulation models, and evolutionary moral scoring engines in AI systems; downloadable electronic publications in the nature of ebooks, whitepapers, technical framework documentation in the nature of manuals, simulation manuals, and digital ethics certification guides in the field of philosophy, ethics, artificial intelligence, and systems theory | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Printed publications, namely, books, handbooks, educational workbooks, printed framework treatises, and philosophical training manuals in the field of philosophy, ethics, artificial intelligence, and systems theory | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, conducting programs, and lectures, online programs via digital learning platforms, all in the fields of philosophy, artificial intelligence, and moral reasoning and distribution of course and educational materials in connection therewith; education services, namely, conducting programs, lectures, and online programs via digital learning platforms all in the field of philosophy, artificial intelligence, and moral reasoning | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design, development, and implementation of software for philosophical and ethical frameworks, namely, AI systems, machine learning tools, ethical decision-making systems, and adaptive reasoning engines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Toan Thi Minh Bui
- Other trademarks owned by Toan Thi Minh Bui
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named EET
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2026 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 2, 2026 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 31, 2026 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 3, 2026 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2026 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 28, 2026 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 8, 2026 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2026 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2026 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2026 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 8, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 10, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |