USPTO serial 99195719
OVERWATCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUSKIN, MATTHEW SEAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OVERWATCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
C. Richard Martin
C. Richard Martin MARTIN IP LAW GROUP, PC225 Court St.Evansville, IN 47708United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Wireless controllers to remotely monitor and control the function and status of other electrical, electronic, and mechanical devices or systems, namely, trucks, for use while monitoring truck bed impact g-forces, vibration, gyroscopic motion, ambient cab noise and decibel levels experienced during the process of loading surface haul trucks; Vehicle safety equipment, namely, electronic vibration, mechanical shock, motion, angle, and temperature monitors; Recorded computer software and hardware for remotely monitoring industrial equipment and machinery and transmitting data for analysis sold as a unit | ACTIVE | May 1, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 11, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 20, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 7, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |