Drawing for CHURCH'S FLOORING

USPTO serial 99196057

CHURCH'S FLOORING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 681
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHURCH'S FLOORING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph A DAngelo

Joseph A DAngelo Joe DAngelo Law620 Park Avenue Suite 185Rochester, NY 14607United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Retail store services featuring retail flooring and flooring accessories.ACTIVEJul 7, 2021
037Building construction, remodeling and repair; Installation, maintenance and repair of flooring, backsplashes, showers, stairs; Remodeling of residential and commercial buildings.ACTIVEJul 7, 2021

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 4, 2026NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 13, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 10, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 9, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 9, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 28, 2026XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Jul 28, 2026XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
May 7, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 7, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 7, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 8, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 7, 2026NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Apr 7, 2026PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 20, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 20, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 20, 2026PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 20, 2026MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 20, 2026ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 4, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 4, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 4, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 3, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 29, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 22, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 21, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance