USPTO serial 99196606
ARC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MURRAY, GEORGE WILLIAM
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ARC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher Reeder
Christopher Reeder Reeder McCreary, LLP11766 Wilshire BlvdSuite 1470Los Angeles, CA 90025Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Post-production editing of advertising or commercials; Post-production editing services for video and audio commercials | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2016 |
| 041 | Videotape editing; Video editing; Film editing; Video tape editing; Cinematographic adaptation and editing; Editing of television programmes; Production and editing services for radio and television programmes; Post-production editing services in the field of music, videos and film | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 26, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 26, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2026 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 26, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 26, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 6, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 7, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |