Drawing for SEARCHLIGHT CYBER

USPTO serial 99197648

SEARCHLIGHT CYBER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ROACH, APRIL K
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SEARCHLIGHT CYBER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer M. Abma

Jennifer M. Abma Abma, Blose & Cave, Attorneys At Law, LLPPO Box 9350Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Technology consultation in the field of cybersecurity; Computer security threat analysis for protecting data; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for computer forensic services and security threat analysis for protecting data; Computer forensic services; Computer security consultancy; Data security consultancyACTIVEDec 26, 2022

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 8, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 8, 2025GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 8, 2025GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 8, 2025CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 3, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 3, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 3, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 3, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 3, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 3, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 2, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 30, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 22, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 22, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance