USPTO serial 99198583
STYLESTIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 794
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TWAY, TATIANA R
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STYLESTIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Happy Valley, OR, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ERIC A LAMORTE
ERIC A LAMORTE LAMORTE & ASSOCIATES PCPO BOX 434YARDLEY, PA 19067-8434UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Stickers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2026 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 10, 2026 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2026 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2026 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 17, 2026 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 30, 2026 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 25, 2026 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 22, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2026 | PGTT | PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2026 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 19, 2026 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 15, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 11, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 20, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 20, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 20, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |