Drawing for AGENTIX

USPTO serial 99200695

AGENTIX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BHANOT, KAPIL KUMAR
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AGENTIX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joshua L. Simmons

Joshua L. Simmons Kirkland & Ellis LLP601 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10022United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in managing computer network security; software as a service (SAAS) for managing security with agentic AI capabilities; software as a service (SAAS) for a security platform to build and orchestrate AI agents for computer network security; monitoring of computer systems for security purposes in the nature of cybersecurity, unauthorized access, data breach, and detectionACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 25, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 27, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 27, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 27, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 22, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 22, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 22, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 9, 2026AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Apr 9, 2026PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 2026XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Jan 14, 2026XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Oct 23, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 23, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 23, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 10, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 8, 2025LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
Oct 1, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 23, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 23, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance