Drawing for OMNIA

USPTO serial 99205732

OMNIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 802
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HOWARD, PARKER WALDRIP
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OMNIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Claudia W. Stangle

Claudia W. Stangle Leydig, Voit & Mayer, Ltd.180 N. Stetson Ave.Suite 4900Chicago, IL 60601-6745

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009X-ray apparatus for industrial purposes; X-ray apparatus, not for medical purposes; non-destructive testing equipment by radiography used in industrial applications; industrial x-ray systems for non-medical use, consisting of x-ray tube, x-ray generator and controller, in particular for non-destructive testing, for evaluating and diagnosing apparatuses, for castings and for mechanical, electromechanical and electronic apparatus and components, for maintenance purposes and for use in aeronautical engineering or space technology; industrial x-ray systems for non-medical use, consisting of x-ray tube, x-ray generator, detector, radiation exposure chamber, manipulator and recorded control software, in particular for non-destructive testing, for evaluating and diagnosing apparatuses, for castings and for mechanical, electromechanical and electronic apparatuses and components, for maintenance purposes and for use in aeronautical engineering and space technology; 2D radioscopy apparatus; 2D X-ray apparatus for non-destructive testing; 2D x-ray apparatus for the inspection of castings; 2D x-ray apparatus for the automatic inspection of wheels; 2D x-ray apparatus for automated defect recognition in compliance with ASTM standardsACTIVE—
042X-ray imaging, other than for medical purposes; non-destructive testing of aircraft structures, engines and components; In-line inspection of castings, gigacastings, megacastings and die-cast aluminumACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 2, 2026EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Oct 2, 2026TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2026ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Oct 2, 2026ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 2, 2026REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 29, 2026ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 5, 2026NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 5, 2026PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 29, 2026NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 7, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 6, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 6, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 6, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 31, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 2, 2025ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 25, 2025PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Nov 4, 2025CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 30, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 30, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 30, 2025ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2025GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 17, 2025GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 17, 2025CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 15, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 6, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 28, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 28, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance