USPTO serial 99215918
NGENIUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 760
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, BRENDAN K
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NGENIUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
AMANDA K. GREENSPON
Amanda K. Greenspon Munck Wilson Mandala, LLP2000 McKinney Ave., Suite 1900Dallas, TX 75201United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for monitoring and management of performance and availability of software applications; Software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others for analyzing wireless, cable, and wireline service performance; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for analyzing computer network performance; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for monitoring and management of performance and availability of software applications; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for hosting software for use by others for analyzing wireless, cable, and wireline service performance; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for analyzing computer network performance; Design and development of computer hardware and software; Computer diagnostic services; Computer system design services; Computer programming services, namely, creating indexes of information, sites and other resources available on computer networks; Computer programming services, namely, monitoring, testing, analyzing, and reporting on the Internet traffic control and content control of the websites of others; Computer programming services, namely, providing search engines for obtaining data on a global computer network; computer virus protection services; Consulting services in the field of software as a service (SAAS); Consulting services in the field of cloud computing; Consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; Consulting in the field of configuration management for computer hardware and software; Computer security consultancy in the field of application and network performance management; Consultation services relating to computer software; IT consulting services relating to installation, maintenance and repair of computer software; Computer software consultancy; Information technology consultancy relating to installation, maintenance and repair of computer software; Computer technical support services, namely, 24/7 service desk or help desk services for IT infrastructure, operating systems, database systems, and web applications; Technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of industrial process control computer software problems; Technical support services, namely, remote and on-site infrastructure management services for monitoring, administration and management of public and private cloud computing IT and application systems; Technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems; Computer programming services for others in the field of software configuration management; Consulting services in the field of hosting computer software applications | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2026 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 3, 2026 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2026 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2026 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 3, 2026 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 26, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| May 26, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 4, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 2, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 4, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |