USPTO serial 99218284
TECHNOLOGY OPERATING SYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 645Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLASSER, CARYN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with TECHNOLOGY OPERATING SYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Arlington, VA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Aaron Oakley
Aaron Oakley Thomas Oakley PLLC1801 Wewatta Street, 11th FloorDenver, CO 80202United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business analysis and business strategic planning services in the technology industry; Business strategic planning services in the field of analyzing technology and technology forecasting, namely mapping technology to the mission of a business, creating a technology landscape, and monitoring, measuring, forecasting, and deciding processes | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for analyzing technology for business planning and technology forecasting purposes, namely mapping technology to the mission of a business, creating a technology landscape, and monitoring, measuring, forecasting, and deciding processes; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for analyzing technology for business planning and technology forecasting purposes, namely mapping technology to the mission of a business, creating a technology landscape, and monitoring, measuring, forecasting, and deciding processes; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for analyzing technology for business planning and technology forecasting purposes, namely mapping technology to the mission of a business, creating a technology landscape, and monitoring, measuring, forecasting, and deciding processes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Aug 14, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 14, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 14, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 24, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 24, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Jan 24, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |