USPTO serial 99218299
TECHNOLOGY PORTFOLIO PRIORITIZATION MATRIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 645Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLASSER, CARYN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with TECHNOLOGY PORTFOLIO PRIORITIZATION MATRIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Arlington, VA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Aaron Oakley
Aaron Oakley Thomas Oakley PLLC1801 Wewatta Street, 11th FloorDenver, CO 80202United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business analysis and business strategic planning services in the technology industry; Business strategic planning services in the field of analyzing technology and technology forecasting utilizing a qualitative-quantitative tool for systems analysis following a systems decomposition | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for analyzing technology for business planning and technology forecasting purposes, namely a qualitative-quantitative tool for systems analysis following a systems decomposition; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for analyzing technology for business planning and technology forecasting purposes utilizing a qualitative-quantitative matrix for systems analysis following a systems decomposition; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for analyzing technology for business planning and technology forecasting purposes utilizing a qualitative-quantitative tool for systems analysis following a systems decomposition | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Aug 24, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 25, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 25, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 1, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 30, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Jan 30, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |