USPTO serial 99223656
MIRA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AURAND, KYLE C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 126
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MIRA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Concord, CA, US
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Creating, hosting, and maintaining ecommerce websites for others; technological consulting services for digital transformation in the field of ecommerce and online business operations; software design and development for ecommerce platforms and digital commerce systems; information technology consulting relating to computer software design for ecommerce and online transaction systems; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for ecommerce, namely, software to enable online storefront management, product catalog management, shopping cart functionality, checkout processing, and order management, expressly excluding software featuring consumer product reviews, product recommendations, comparison engines, social networking, content sharing, or beauty-, cosmetics-, skin care-, or hair care-related content; technology consultation in the field of artificial intelligence as applied to ecommerce operations and business analytics; research, design, and development of software using artificial intelligence for ecommerce and digital commerce applications; computer services, namely, integration of computer software into multiple systems and networks for ecommerce operations; developing customized software for others in the field of ecommerce and digital commerce; website design for ecommerce businesses; None of the foregoing include or relate to consumer-facing software providing product reviews, product recommendations, product comparisons, social networking, content sharing, or software in the fields of beauty, cosmetics, skin care, or hair care | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2021 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 17, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 29, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 29, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 2025 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |