USPTO serial 99224856
BOOSTER JUICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- O'NEILL, MARY K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BOOSTER JUICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Edmonton, AB, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tanja Proehl
Tanja Proehl Greer, Burns & Crain, Ltd.200 W. Madison St.Suite 2100Chicago, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Non-alcoholic beverages in the nature of fruit and vegetable juice, smoothies, shakes, and drinks; fruit juices and fruit juice drinks; syrups and preparations for making all of the aforesaid beverages | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | The bringing together, for the benefit of others, of a variety of food and beverages, excluding the transport thereof, enabling customers to conveniently view and purchase those goods in a food and drink establishment or bar, from a catalogue, by mail order, by telephone or by other means of communication via the internet; Franchise services, namely, administration of the business affairs of franchises; business advice, assistance and consultancy relating to franchising; Franchising, namely, consultation and assistance in business management, organization and promotion; Business management advisory services relating to franchising; Advertising, marketing, promotional and publicity services relating to franchising; Provision of information, consultancy and advice relating to all the aforesaid services | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Services for providing food and drink in the nature of restaurant, bar and catering services; Provision of information, consultancy and advice relating to all of the aforesaid services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 9, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 5, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 21, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 20, 2025 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |