Drawing for TRANSLUCENT

USPTO serial 99228697

TRANSLUCENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRANSLUCENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PERRY J. VISCOUNTY

PERRY J. VISCOUNTY LATHAM & WATKINS LLP650 TOWN CENTER DRIVE, SUITE 2000COSTA MESA, CA 92626UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for providing healthcare provider organizations with financial tools for financial planning and analysis, P&L management, and reportingACTIVESep 23, 2024

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 20, 2026MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 8, 2026ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 8, 2026EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 8, 2026EXDDEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED—
Aug 3, 2026EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 3, 2026EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 10, 2026XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Apr 10, 2026XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Feb 4, 2026GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 4, 2026GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 4, 2026CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 18, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2025CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Dec 18, 2025COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 16, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 16, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 5, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 5, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 11, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 11, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 11, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance