USPTO serial 99229685
BLUEAIR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LIU, PHILIP
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BLUEAIR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Gardena, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Justin D. Lee
Justin D. Lee Lee, Hong, Degerman, Kang & Waimey660 South Figueroa Street Suite 2300Los Angeles, CA 90017United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Commercial and industrial refrigerator and freezers for use in the food service industry; Commercial and industrial ice making machines for use in the food service industry; Restaurant equipment, namely, kitchen sinks for use in the food service industry; Commercial and industrial refrigerated food display cases | ACTIVE | Oct 9, 2018 |
| 020 | Tables for use in food preparation and equipment stands in the nature of work tables for use in the food service industry; Shelving and component parts thereof, namely, shelves and brackets sold as a unit for use in the food service industry | ACTIVE | Oct 9, 2018 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 6, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 8, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 8, 2026 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2026 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2026 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2026 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 6, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 2, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 3, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Feb 3, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |