USPTO serial 99230932
COGNETICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COGNETICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD LEE MORRIS JR ESQ
RICHARD LEE MORRIS JR ESQ 1-800-4-TRADEMARK PAP.O. Box 398538c/o TrademarkRenewals.comMiami Beach, FL 33239Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | On-line journals, namely, blogs featuring the subject of the usability of artificial intelligence (AI) and user experience regarding the same for strategic and innovative decision-making requiring critical thinking skills, for developing and demonstrating effective leadership, communication, and team development skills, and for personal growth; Providing on-line courses of instruction in the field of the usability of artificial intelligence (AI) and user experience regarding the same for strategic and innovative decision-making requiring critical thinking skills, for developing and demonstrating effective leadership, communication, and team development skills, and for personal growth, and distribution of training materials in connection therewith; Educational services, namely, providing online non-downloadable webinars, online group tutorial sessions, and online seminars via a website all in the field of the usability of artificial intelligence (AI) and user experience regarding the same for strategic and innovative decision-making requiring critical thinking skills, for developing and demonstrating effective leadership, communication, and team development skills, and for personal growth; Providing online non-downloadable electronic publications in the nature of articles, articles featuring editorial content, articles featuring personal interview content, and articles featuring personal profile content all on the subject of the usability of artificial intelligence (AI) and user experience regarding the same for strategic and innovative decision-making requiring critical thinking skills, for developing and demonstrating effective leadership, communication, and team development skills, and for personal growth; Providing online non-downloadable journals and resource guides all on the subject of the usability of artificial intelligence (AI) and user experience regarding the same for strategic and innovative decision-making requiring critical thinking skills, for developing and demonstrating effective leadership, communication, and team development skills, and for personal growth | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 22, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 20, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 17, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 3, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |