Drawing for AUTHENTIC REVIEWS BAZAARVOICE

USPTO serial 99231464

AUTHENTIC REVIEWS BAZAARVOICE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 748
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TAYLOR, DAVID T
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AUTHENTIC REVIEWS BAZAARVOICE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rebecca McCurry

Rebecca McCurry Pirkey Barber PLLC1801 East 6th St, Suite 300Austin, TX 78702United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business consultation in the field of consumer review analysis and marketing; Monitoring consumer ratings and reviews for business purposes; Advertising, marketing and promotion services; Business data analysis; Business marketing services; Consumer marketing research and consulting related thereto; Consulting services in the field of internet marketingACTIVEJun 25, 2025
042Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for consumers to share information and provide product and service reviews; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for enabling the submission, display, aggregation, and analysis of ratings, reviews, and user generated content; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for reviewing and analyzing product and services reviews; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for analyzing the authenticity of ratings, reviews, and user-generated content; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for monitoring, detecting, identifying, alerting, and reporting suspicious, fraudulent, profane, and/or vulgar ratings, reviews, or user-generated content; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for content moderation; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for detecting bias in online consumer product and services reviews and adding disclaimers; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for syndicating consumer feedback and input regarding brands, products and services across various media and social channels; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for helping brand owners and retailers analyze consumer feedback and input across various media and social channels; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for advertising, business marketing, consumer marketing research, and social media marketingACTIVEJun 25, 2025

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 27, 2026SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 22, 2026IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Oct 22, 2026EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Apr 28, 2026NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 3, 2026NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 3, 2026PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 25, 2026NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 4, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 3, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 3, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 3, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 14, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 1, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 20, 2025MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Oct 20, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 12, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 12, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance