USPTO serial 99235464
SHURIKEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHOOR, AMIT KUMAR
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 117
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SHURIKEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stacy J. Grossman
Stacy J. Grossman SGIP500 Mamaroneck Avenue, Suite 320Harrison, NY 10528United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Hats; Shoes; Short-sleeved T-shirts; Bandanas; Neckerchiefs; Underwear; nightwear; Track jackets; Sweat shirts; Visors being headwear; Sun visors being headwear; Face coverings being balaclavas; Knitwear, namely, tops and bottoms; Aprons; Thermal gloves for tapping touchscreen devices; Neckties made in whole or in substantial part of silk; body suits for babies; Costumes for use in role-playing games; Costumes for use in children's dress up play; Neckties; Face mask being headwear; Clothing belts; Socks; Shawls; headscarves | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, providing downloadable multi-player video games; Interactive downloadable multi-player computer game services; Providing interactive downloadable multi-player computer games via the internet and electronic communication networks; Providing entertainment information in the field of video games via a website; Organization of entertainment events in the nature of electronic gaming competitions; none of the foregoing being online casino style games | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| May 9, 2026 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2026 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2026 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 26, 2026 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 3, 2026 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2026 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 13, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Jan 13, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |