USPTO serial 99239879
ONYVA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NGUYEN, CINDY EVANS
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ONYVA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Jiangsu Province, CN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Henry Ginhai Chow
2880 Zanker Road, Suite 203San Jose, CA 95134United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Money boxes; Non-electric yogurt makers; Fibreglass, other than for insulation or textile use; Portable cool boxes, non-electric; Non-electric portable beverage coolers; Fiberglass, other than for insulation or textile use; Modified sheet glass, not for building; Decorative glass, not for building; Hand-operated food grinders; Funnels for kitchen use; Kitchen sponges; Pedal bins; Hand-operated cooking sieves and sifters; Hand-operated flour sifters for household use; Cotton gloves for household purposes | PARTIALLY PAID | Apr 27, 2025 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 29, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 11, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 18, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |