Drawing for VILIGHT

USPTO serial 99239961

VILIGHT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 661
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KUHN, RIO NICE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 127

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VILIGHT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel Velizarov Dimov

Rue Vanderkindere 171/14Brussels, 1180BELGIUM

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Desk lamps; LED light strips for decorative purposes; LED string lightsACTIVE—
035On-line wholesale and retail store services featuring LED lighting products, smart lighting systems, and related accessories; Advertising and promotional servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 12, 2026TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2026ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 12, 2026REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 12, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 12, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 17, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 5, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 19, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 18, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 18, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance