USPTO serial 99245957
PREMIER DUCT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 794
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WRIGHT, MARCO JABBAR
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PREMIER DUCT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHANNA R LANDRENEAU
JOHANNA R LANDRENEAU LANDRENEAU & ASSOCIATES, L.L.C.8282 GOODWOOD BLVDBATON ROUGE, LA 70806UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Building and construction materials in the nature of modular pre-cast concrete duct banks containing pre-cast concrete conduits designed to protect and consolidate cabling or fluids between service connections such as to and from buildings, electrical substations, data centers, oil and gas and chemical processing plants, power generating plants, waste water treatment plants, airports, food processing facilities, hospitals, commercial and industrial buildings, sub-grade electric grounding systems, surface transportation crossings, waterway crossings, electric utility network systems and telecommunication utility network systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2026 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 1, 2026 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2026 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2026 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 25, 2026 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 25, 2026 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 25, 2026 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 25, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2026 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 29, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 29, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 30, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 25, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Jan 25, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |