USPTO serial 99247476
DENSALLOY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 647Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KHAN, ASMAT A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with DENSALLOY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Largo, FL, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Felix Faerber
Felix Faerber Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC3414 Peachtree Road NESuite 1500Atlanta, GA 30326Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metals for electrodes, namely, machinable tungsten carbide, tungsten iron, tungsten ores and tungsten powder for industrial purposes; Metals and metal alloys, namely high-density tungsten alloys for metal forgings | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 2025 |
| 007 | Casting and molding machine parts, namely, die-casting dies, die casting machines cores and core pins; Permanent mold casting dies, cores and core pins all being die casting machine parts; Extrusion machine parts, namely, extrusion dies, cores, and core pins; Wire drawing machine parts, namely, metal drawing dies | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 2025 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2026 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 13, 2026 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2026 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2026 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2026 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2026 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2026 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 4, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 19, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 11, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 29, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |