USPTO serial 99250634
CHARLOTTE AI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VALLILLO, MELISSA C
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHARLOTTE AI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Cedar Rapids, IA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Courtney Thompson
Courtney Thompson Fredrikson & Byron, P.A.60 South Sixth StreetSuite 1500Minneapolis, MN 55402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for workflow automation, decision support for animal agriculture operations, and inputting, accessing, storing, and analyzing animal health, welfare, production, and compliance information and data with artificial intelligence (AI); Downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for workflow automation, decision support for animal agriculture operations, and inputting, accessing, storing, and analyzing animal health, welfare, production, and compliance information and data; downloadable computer software for workflow automation, decision support for animal agriculture operations, and inputting, accessing, storing, and analyzing animal health, welfare, production, and compliance information and data; downloadable computer software for workflow automation, decision support for animal agriculture operations, and inputting, accessing, storing, and analyzing animal health, welfare, production, and compliance information and data with artificial intelligence (AI) | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing a web site featuring temporary use of non-downloadable software for workflow automation, decision support for animal agriculture operations, and inputting, accessing, storing, and analyzing animal health, welfare, production, and compliance information and data;; Providing a web site featuring temporary use of non-downloadable software for workflow automation, decision support for animal agriculture operations, and inputting, accessing, storing, and analyzing animal health, welfare, production, and compliance information and data with artificial intelligence (AI); Providing a web site featuring temporary use of non-downloadable software for technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems;; Design, maintenance, development and updating of computer software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 9, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 12, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 10, 2026 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 10, 2026 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 19, 2026 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2026 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 21, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 18, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |