USPTO serial 99253234
MOTRA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 651
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COHEN, ROBERT ANDREW
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MOTRA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Huntsville, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rachelle A. Dubow
Rachelle A. Dubow Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLPOne Federal StreetBoston, MA 02110United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Providing access to a worldwide computer network | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (Saas) services featuring software for mobile and wearable devices for measuring, predicting, and tracking fitness activity including workout exercises, weightlifting, yoga, Pilates, martial arts, racket sports, swimming, basketball, ice hockey, paddling, and anaerobic fitness activities; Software as a service (Saas) services featuring software for mobile and wearable devices for sharing fitness activity information with other users; Software as a service (Saas) services featuring software for mobile and wearable devices for storing fitness health information, goals, and activities, and for generating health, fitness and wellness recommendations; Computer software development in the field of mobile applications for wearable fitness tracking devices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 9, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 21, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 24, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 18, 2026 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 17, 2026 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 16, 2026 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 16, 2026 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |