USPTO serial 99255106
ROBOMATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SCHNELL, BENJAMIN L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 136
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with ROBOMATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jae Hoon Kim
1930 Isaac Newton Square, Suite 240Reston, VA 20190United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Humanoid robots with artificial intelligence for use in scientific research; Teaching robots; Humanoid robots having communication and learning functions for assisting and entertaining people; Laboratory robots; Humanoid robots with artificial intelligence for use in household cleaning and laundry; Telepresence robots; Recorded educational software featuring instruction in computer programming; Downloadable educational software featuring instruction in computer programming; Downloadable children's educational software; Recorded children's educational software; Downloadable industrial process control software; Downloadable factory automation software, namely, software to integrate manufacturing machine operations, track problems and generate production reports; Downloadable computer software for wireless content delivery | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2026 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 9, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 3, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 27, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 15, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |