USPTO serial 99261840
AIRP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARROLL, DORITT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AIRP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer D. Silverman
Jennifer D. Silverman Jennifer Silverman PLLC348 West 57th StreetSuite 331New York, NY 10019Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable cloud-based software that makes use of artificial intelligence and governance frameworks in order to guide classification, labeling, and alert generation within an artificial intelligence software system for the purpose of identifying, preventing, responding to, and implementing unified controls of, compliance risks, employee misconduct, and regulatory breaches; digital media content, namely downloadable electronic magazines and newsletters in the field of operational logic and ethical standards applied by an artificial intelligence software system. | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Printed manuals, white papers, and technical publications, namely journals in the field of artificial intelligence governance frameworks used to guide the classification, labeling, and alert generation within an artificial intelligence software system; printed marketing brochures and printed educational materials in the field of artificial intelligence governance frameworks used to guide the classification, labeling, and alert generation within an artificial intelligence software system. | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Information technology services, namely the design and development of artificial intelligence software featuring governance frameworks that define how artificial intelligence systems assess and respond to risk. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 3, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 3, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2026 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 3, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 17, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Feb 17, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 5, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |