USPTO serial 99262223
BEDROCK OPERATOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MTANOS, CHRISTOPHER GEORGE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 135
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BEDROCK OPERATOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SAN FRANCISCO, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J Andri
Michael J Andri Alleman Hall LLP900 SW 5th Ave.Suite 2300Portland, OR 97204Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Downloadable computer software for operating autonomous heavy machinery, and autonomous heavy equipment; Downloadable computer software for monitoring operation of autonomous heavy machinery, and autonomous heavy equipment; Downloadable computer software for capturing, analyzing, and reporting operational telematics data of autonomous heavy machinery, and autonomous heavy equipment | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Retrofit hardware and software for converting heavy machinery into autonomous heavy machinery; Retrofit hardware and software for converting heavy equipment into autonomous heavy equipment | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service services featuring software for operating autonomous heavy machinery, and autonomous heavy equipment; Software as a service services featuring software for monitoring operation of autonomous heavy machinery, and autonomous heavy equipment; Software as a service services featuring software for capturing, analyzing, and reporting operational telematics data of autonomous heavy machinery, and autonomous heavy equipment; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for operating autonomous heavy machinery, and autonomous heavy equipment; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for monitoring operation of autonomous heavy machinery, and autonomous heavy equipment; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for capturing, analyzing, and reporting operational telematics data of autonomous heavy machinery, and autonomous heavy equipment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 22, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 20, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Feb 20, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |