USPTO serial 99262942
NIBIRU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, SANG MIN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NIBIRU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Matrix Foundation (Cayman Island)
George Town, Grand Cayman, KY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Muzamil Huq
Muzamil Huq Morrison & Foerster LLP425 Market Street, Suite #3200San Francisco, CA 94105United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software development tools; Downloadable computer software platforms for application development; Downloadable software for enabling users access to a blockchain; Downloadable software for blockchain infrastructure providing a base layer for applications in the fields of blockchain, cryptocurrency, digital currency, and digital financial assets | ACTIVE | Aug 3, 2022 |
| 042 | Providing online non-downloadable software development tools for creating blockchain-based applications provided by a blockchain as a service (BAAS) provider; Customizing, maintaining, and updating computer software used by others to develop blockchain-based software applications; Computer programming of smart contracts on a blockchain; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software development tools; Providing temporary use of on-line nondownloadable software for enabling users access to a blockchain; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for blockchain infrastructure providing a base layer for applications in the fields of blockchain, cryptocurrency, digital currency, and digital financial assets; Providing online non-downloadable computer software platforms for application development | ACTIVE | Aug 3, 2022 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 24, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 30, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 20, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |