USPTO serial 99263520
SHORT CODE VOICE NUMBER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 649Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MEBANE, ANASTASIA XAVIERA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 129
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with SHORT CODE VOICE NUMBER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Bettendorf, IA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ted D. Karr
Ted D. Karr Berkeley Law & Technology Group LLP7710 Rialto Blvd, Suite 100Austin, TX 78735United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Telecommunication services, namely, providing advanced calling and routing features; telecommunication services, namely, managing a registry for brands | ACTIVE | Oct 23, 2026 |
| 042 | Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for use in routing services in the field of telecommunications; Providing on-line non-downloadable software for use in managing a registry for brands in the field of telecommunications | ACTIVE | Oct 23, 2026 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2026 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 28, 2026 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2026 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2026 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2026 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2026 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2026 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 20, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2026 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 5, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 5, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 4, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 5, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |