CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for SOHU

USPTO serial 99266088

SOHU

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 774
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GREEN, ASHLEY ELIZABETH
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SOHU?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SETH H. REAGAN

SETH H. REAGAN ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP2050 MAIN ST.SUITE 1100IRVINE, CA 92614

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Microchips; computer hardware and microchips for artificial intelligence computing, for analyzing, processing, and artificially generating text, speech, and dynamic conversations, and for controlling and operating generative transformers, large language models, natural language processing software, and artificial neural networksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 8, 2026ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Jul 1, 2026OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Mar 19, 2026ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Mar 10, 2026NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 10, 2026PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 4, 2026NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 12, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 23, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 23, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 23, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 11, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 20, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 7, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 3, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 3, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance