USPTO serial 99270351
STEALTH MEDIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GUARNIERI,GRACE K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 130
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STEALTH MEDIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer C. Debrow
Jennifer C. Debrow Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP2200 IDS Center, 80 South Eighth StreetMinneapolis, MN 55402United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising agency services; Marketing services in the nature of brand management; Business reputation management and improvement services; Consulting services in the field of digital marketing; Marketing services in the nature of digital marketing agencies providing development and production of digital marketing campaigns for others; Marketing services in the nature of digital marketing strategic plan development services for others; Direct marketing consulting services; Marketing the goods and services of others by means of direct marketing services; Business marketing consulting services; Development of marketing strategies and concepts; Search engine optimization for sales promotion; Website traffic optimization | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Video production services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Designing websites for advertising purposes; Designing websites for others; Graphic design of logos; Website design and development for others; Website design consultancy | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 5, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 8, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 5, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 18, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Feb 18, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |