USPTO serial 99274589
NIMA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KENEALY, NATALIE LANGFORD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NIMA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gregory B. Coy
Gregory B. Coy Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLPOne Indiana SquareSuite 3500INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | downloadable computer software application that analyzes and transmits food and other analyte test results; downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for users to obtain and share information regarding food, food components, food products, and food sources; downloadable computer software for use in forming virtual communities, engaging in social networking and sharing of information regarding food, food components, food products and food sources | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | providing a website featuring technology that enables consumers to form virtual communities, engage in social networking and share information regarding food, food components, food products and food sources; providing online non-downloadable computer software for synchronizing databases with mobile device applications to receive data from the mobile device; providing on-line non-downloadable computer software for use in forming virtual communities, engaging in social networking and sharing of information regarding food, food components, food products and food sources | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 21, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 8, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Jul 8, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2026 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 13, 2026 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 9, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 20, 2026 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 11, 2026 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2026 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |