Drawing for METCON

USPTO serial 99274804

METCON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 661
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BELL, MARLENE D
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 118

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with METCON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Frank J. Bonini Jr.

Frank J. Bonini Jr. Bonini IP Law, LLC150 N RADNOR CHESTER RDSTE F200RADNOR, PA 19087-5245

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Scientific instrumentation for measuring water quality; water testing instrumentation for monitoring and detecting contaminationACTIVE
011Water treatment apparatus for use in filtering contaminants, namely, drinking water treatment and wastewater treatment in municipal, industrial, commercial, and community developments, comprising modular supports and racks, tanks, namely, waste water treatment tanks and pressure vessels, and regulating accessories for water treatment apparatus, namely, valves, pipes, hoses, filter media holders, namely, pilot skids and pilot skid assemblies for municipal, industrial, commercial and community development water purificationACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 4, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 4, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 4, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 4, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 4, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 4, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 27, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 27, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 27, 2026NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED
Apr 27, 2026PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Apr 27, 2026PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Mar 30, 2026MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 30, 2026ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 6, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 26, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 14, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jul 9, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jul 9, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance