USPTO serial 99277322
THRIVEMD ADVISORS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 760
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HA, PAULINE T.
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THRIVEMD ADVISORS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
TICORA E. DAVIS
9900 POPLAR TENT RDSTE 115 PMB 3052CONCORD, NC 28027Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consulting, management, and planning services in the field of medical practice operations, clinical administration, healthcare insurance coordination, medical billing and coding, and financial health optimization for physicians and medical professionals; Consulting in the fields of healthcare operations management and hospital operations management; Outsource service provider in the field of business management of hospitals; Business consulting services in the field of medical practice management for others in the field of medical practice | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2026 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 12, 2026 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 12, 2026 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 12, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2026 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2026 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 7, 2026 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 18, 2026 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2026 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2026 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2026 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 10, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 8, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 4, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Mar 4, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |