Drawing for VENN

USPTO serial 99277431

VENN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VENN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jessica L. Rothstein

Jessica L. Rothstein Goodwin Procter LLP620 Eighth AvenueNew York, NY 10018United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009downloadable software featuring artificial intelligence to enable enterprise users to access, review, organize, query, enter, edit, write, and alter data from third party enterprise softwareACTIVE—
042providing online, non-downloadable software featuring artificial intelligence to enable enterprise users to access, review, organize, query, enter, edit, write, and alter data from third party enterprise softwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 30, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 2, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 2, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 2, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 28, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 28, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 3, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 17, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 10, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 10, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance