Drawing for SHARK

USPTO serial 99278219

SHARK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLARK, ANDREW T
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SHARK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Knife steels; Knife handles; Fruit knives; Cutlery, namely, scalers; Biodegradable cutlery, namely, knives, forks and spoons; Plastic cutlery, namely, knives, forks, and spoons; Compostable and biodegradable cutlery, namely, knives, spoons, forks; Non-electric vegetable peelers; Hand-operated vegetable peelers; Vegetable peelers, hand-operated; Knife sharpeners; Knife bags; Knife sheaths; Diving knife holders; Knife sheaths of leather; Hand tools, namely, knife sharpeners; Hand-operated knife to aid in skinning an animal; Grapefruit trimmer, namely, a kitchen knife with serrated edges; Spreader in the nature of a small knife for butter or cheese; Serving knives; Pen knives; Hunting knives; Vegetable knives; Carving knives; Scaling knives; Razor knives; Folding knives; Pocket knives; Working knives; Palette knives; Throwing knives; Butcher knives; Paring knives; Chef knives; Bagel knives; Fleshing knives; Butter knives; Cheese knives; Compostable knives; Disposable knives; Mincing knives; Cake knives; Hobby knives; Steak knives; Fixed blade knives; Tactical knives; Knives being tableware; Fruit carving knives; Fish-skinning knives; Fish scaling knives; Fish slicing kitchen knives; Sterling silver table knives; Meat choppers being knives; Japanese chopping kitchen knives; Stainless steel table knives, forks and spoonsACTIVEMay 1, 2025

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 7, 2026MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 7, 2026ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 30, 2026RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
Mar 30, 2026RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
Mar 30, 2026RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Feb 21, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 21, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 21, 2026ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2026GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 19, 2026GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 19, 2026CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 18, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 18, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 18, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 15, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 17, 2025MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Nov 17, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 11, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 11, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance