USPTO serial 99279617
P14
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 645Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NADEAU, MADELINE JEAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with P14?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Bellevue, WA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Danielle I. Mattessich
Danielle I. Mattessich Merchant & Gould P.C.P.O. Box 2910Minneapolis, MN 55402United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Engine and motor parts for land vehicles; Parts for land vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Land vehicles and structural parts therefore; Motors and engines for land vehicles, and parts and fittings therefor | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Vehicle maintenance and repair services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for interactive communication with an artificial intelligence-powered chatbot concerning land vehicles, vehicle operation, fleet management, vehicle maintenance and repair, navigation, driver safety, and vehicle data analytics; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for fleet management; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for vehicle maintenance management; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring navigation software; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring driver safety software for monitoring and improving driver performance; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for collecting, processing, analyzing, and reporting data relating to land vehicles; providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for vehicle fleet management, vehicle maintenance management, navigation, driver safety, and vehicle data analytics; computer software for interactive communication with an artificial intelligence-powered chatbot concerning land vehicles, vehicle operation, fleet management, vehicle maintenance and repair, navigation, driver safety, and vehicle data analytics; computer software for fleet management, namely, software for tracking, monitoring, and managing vehicle fleets; computer software for vehicle maintenance management; downloadable navigation software for land vehicles; driver safety software for monitoring and improving driver performance; downloadable computer software for collecting, processing, analyzing, and reporting data relating to land vehicles; computer and scientific based services related to land vehicles, engines and motors for land vehicles, vehicle drivers, fleet management, vehicle maintenance and repair, navigation, driver safety, data analytics | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 2, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 5, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 9, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Mar 9, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |